Lesson 8 of 23 · All lessons in this module
- The central limit theorem
- The standard error of the sample meanVideo lesson
- Confidence intervals for the mean
- Value at risk: a one-sided confidence interval
- Populations, samples and sampling error
- Stratified and cluster sampling
- Good estimators, and the CLT across sampling designs
- Convenience and judgmental sampling, and choosing a method
- The four steps and stating the hypotheses
- Type I and Type II errors, significance and powerVideo lesson
- Critical values, p-values and the decision ruleVideo lesson
- p-values and p-hacking
- Testing a single mean
- Two means: independent vs paired samplesVideo lesson
- Testing variances: chi-square and FVideo lesson
- The t-test for a Pearson correlation
- Sample size, p-values and many correlations at once
- Parametric vs nonparametric tests
- The Spearman rank correlation testVideo lesson
- Contingency tables and the chi-square test of independenceVideo lesson
- Interpreting the result: standardized residuals and mosaics
- Choosing the test: four steps and a map of every test
- Integrated cases: testing whether a new strategy beats the old one
This lesson is part of the 2027 curriculum. You are following the 2026 curriculum, where it is not taught in this form. Switch if you are sitting the exam under the 2027 curriculum.
Lesson 8 of 23 · 12 min
Convenience and judgmental sampling, and choosing a method
Non-probability samples are chosen by convenience or expert judgment: quick and cheap, but at real risk of not representing the population.
In short
- Non-probability methods rely on the researcher's selection, not on a fixed random process, so not every member has an equal chance of being chosen.
- Convenience sampling: use what is easiest to access. Fast and low cost, ideal for a pilot study, but the sample may not represent the population, so accuracy can be limited.
- Judgmental sampling: an expert handpicks members. Useful under time pressure or when expertise is critical (e.g. auditing), but exposed to the researcher's bias.
- Probability methods let chance alone drive sampling error; non-probability methods add the risk of a systematically unrepresentative sample.
- Match the method to the goal: inference about a population → probability sampling; index replication → stratified; vast population on a budget → cluster; quick first look → convenience.
Unlock this lesson free for 7 days
Create a free account to get 7 days free: every lesson, video and flashcard, and the question bank. No card needed.