Lesson 1 of 6 · All lessons in this module
  1. Qualitative factors: business, industry and governance
  2. Quantitative factors: the four things to measure
  3. Calculating credit ratiosVideo lesson
  4. Interpreting ratios: trends, peers and covenants
  5. Seniority, priority of claims and recoveryVideo lesson
  6. Issuer versus issue ratings and notching

Free lesson: the first lesson of every module is open to everyone.

Lesson 1 of 6 · 13 min

Qualitative factors: business, industry and governance

Before any ratio is calculated, a credit analyst asks whether the business model, industry, business risks and management make the timing and size of future cash flows reliable enough to meet each debt payment.

In short

  • Creditworthiness rests on the company's ability to generate profits and cash flow large enough to pay interest and principal. Analysts judge both the chance of default (POD) and the loss if it happens (LGD).
  • Qualitative factors: the business model, the industry and competition, business risk (issuer-specific, industry-specific and external) and corporate governance.
  • Stable, predictable cash flows, low business risk and weak competitive pressure mean a higher capacity to carry debt and a lower POD.
  • Debt has a finite life, so the analyst asks how risks evolve over each issue's tenor: long-dated debt is most exposed to strategic change.
  • Secured lenders prefer tangible (hard) collateral to intangible (soft) collateral; collateral matters most for weaker credits.
  • Governance: use of proceeds, covenants, management's track record with bondholders, and accounting red flags such as frequent changes of auditor or CFO.

The credit analyst's question

An equity analyst values every cash flow the company will ever produce. A credit analyst has a narrower, more defensive question: will cash arrive in time and in sufficient size to meet each fixed debt payment until the debt is repaid?

So earning a good return on capital is not enough. A business can be profitable over a cycle and still default if its cash flows are lumpy and a large maturity falls in a bad year.

The qualitative review groups into four areas: the business model, the industry and competitive environment, business risk, and corporate governance. Each feeds into both the probability of default and, through collateral and covenants, the loss given default.

Qualitative factors and what to look for
AreaKey questions
Business modelHow stable and predictable are demand, revenue and margins? How good are the assets?
Industry and competitionHow concentrated is the industry? How strong are the competitive forces? What is long-term growth and demand?
Business riskIssuer-specific deviations from expected results; industry-specific cyclicality, rivalry and life-cycle stage; external risks (macroeconomy, technology, demographics, government, geopolitics, ESG).
Corporate governanceIs debt used as promised? How are debtholders treated? Is the company compliant on legal, tax, accounting and covenant matters?
Business modelstable, predictable cashIndustry, competitionpricing power kept?Business riskover each bond's lifeGovernanceproceeds, covenantsDefault risk viewPOD and LGD
The four qualitative areas are inputs to one judgement: will cash arrive in time and in size to meet every payment until maturity. Governance, through covenants and collateral, bears on the loss given default as well as the probability of default.

Business model, industry and competitive forces

Established firms with stable, predictable cash flows, low business risk and less competitive pressure can safely use more debt and have a lower likelihood of default. Firms with volatile cash flows, high business risk or fierce competition can support less.

Industry analysis uses the familiar competitive forces. Anything that weakens a firm's pricing power or squeezes its margins reduces its capacity to service debt.

Industry structure also shapes credit conditions. In a maturing, slow-growing industry where a few dominant firms are gaining share, lenders tend to tighten terms for small players.

Competitive forces and debt capacity
ForceDebt capacity is higher when the force is…
Threat of new entrants (barriers to entry)Low (high barriers to entry)
Bargaining power of suppliersLow
Bargaining power of customersLow
Threat of substitutesLow
Rivalry within the industryLow

Shortcut: every competitive force works the same way for creditors. The weaker the force, the more pricing power the borrower keeps, and the more cash it has for debt service.

Business risk across the life of each bond

Because each debt claim has a fixed end date, analysts ask how the company's credit quality could change before that date. A short-dated note and a long-dated bond of the same issuer face very different risks.

Holders of very short paper, such as commercial paper, are repaid from today's business, so they focus on liquidity and current cash flow. Holders of long-dated bonds will be repaid from cash flows years away, so they bear the full risk of any strategy shift, technology change or new competition.

This is why a planned transformation (a new product platform, a switch in technology) raises business risk mostly for the longest maturities, even if the near-term picture looks solid.

Collateral: hard versus soft

Unsecured debt is repaid from the company's general cash flows. Secured debt adds specific pledged assets as a secondary source of repayment if those cash flows fail.

Lenders prefer tangible assets (hard collateral): property, plant and equipment, inventory, cash and marketable securities. Intangible assets (soft collateral) such as patents, intellectual property rights and goodwill are harder to value and sell.

Collateral value matters most for lower-quality issuers, and becomes critical once POD is high enough that the lender may actually need to sell the assets. Pledging collateral can lower a company's borrowing cost or open the debt market to it when unsecured borrowing is not available at all.

Corporate governance, character and covenants

Judging management's character is harder for a large public or private-equity-owned company than for an individual borrower. Unlike shareholders, bondholders have no votes, so they protect themselves by fixing the use of proceeds and any restrictions in the debt contract at issuance.

Highly rated issuers of unsecured debt usually borrow for general corporate purposes with only affirmative covenants: obey laws and regulations, keep the current lines of business, insure and maintain assets, pay taxes. High-yield issuers of secured debt typically accept tighter terms: limits on dividends and additional debt, plus financial covenants (for example, a minimum coverage ratio).

Management's track record with bondholders matters. Strategies that caused big downgrades in the past, such as an overleveraged debt-funded acquisition, a large debt-funded special dividend or a debt-funded share buyback, call for a hard look at character.

Aggressive accounting can hide weak performance: heavy off-balance-sheet financing, capitalising costs that should be expensed, and early revenue recognition. Perhaps the biggest red flag is frequently changing auditors or CFOs. Evidence of fraud or malfeasance points to wider problems for creditors.

  • Affirmative covenants: things the issuer must do (comply, maintain, insure, pay taxes). Typical for strong IG issuers.
  • Restrictive and financial covenants: limits on dividends and new debt, minimum ratios. Typical for HY secured issuers.

Worked examples

Example 1 Reading an industry for debt capacity

Varanger Cables makes specialist undersea cable. Three firms supply 80% of the market, building a plant takes years and costs billions, customers sign long contracts, there is no practical substitute, but copper suppliers are few and powerful. Does the industry support high or low debt capacity?

Example 2 Same issuer, different tenors

Solvang Media earns almost all its cash from printed magazines and plans to move most revenue to a subscription streaming platform over ten years. It has 90-day commercial paper, 4-year notes and 20-year bonds outstanding, all unsecured. Which investors are most exposed to the strategy?

Example 3 Spotting governance red flags

An analyst reviews Ostrava Logistics: (1) it has had three CFOs and two audit firms in four years; (2) it has started capitalising routine maintenance; (3) it pays taxes on time and insures its fleet; (4) last year it borrowed to fund a large special dividend. Which items should worry a bondholder?

On the exam

Questions ask which industry feature raises or lowers capacity to repay, which tenor is most exposed to a strategic change, what counts as hard versus soft collateral, and which management or accounting behaviour is a red flag.

  • High barriers to entry are good for creditors: they mean a low threat of new entrants.
  • Long-dated bonds, not commercial paper, carry the most exposure to a long-term strategy shift.
  • Patents and goodwill are soft (intangible) collateral; inventory and cash are hard collateral.
  • Affirmative covenants (pay taxes, maintain assets) are normal for strong issuers; restrictive covenants on dividends and debt are the HY tool.

Check yourself

  1. Q1All else equal, which industry feature most likely lowers a borrower's capacity to service its debt?

  2. Q2A lender asks for collateral. Which pledged asset is most likely to be considered hard collateral?

  3. Q3An issuer begins a ten-year shift to an unproven technology. Which of its unsecured obligations is most exposed to the execution risk?

  4. Q4Which of the following is most likely a red flag about the character of a borrower's management?

  5. Q5A highly rated company issuing unsecured bonds for general corporate purposes most likely accepts:

0/5Check yourself

Answer the 5 questions: +10 XP for each one you get right first time.

Liked this lesson? Get the rest free for 7 days

Create a free account to open the other 5 lessons in this module, with videos, flashcards that come back before you forget them, the question bank and full mocks. No card needed.