Lesson 1 of 6 · All lessons in this module
  1. Short-term bank funding: credit lines, secured loans and factoring
  2. Commercial paper, rollover risk and asset-backed CP
  3. How banks fund themselves: deposits, CDs and the interbank market
  4. Repo mechanics: repo rate, initial margin, haircut and variation marginVideo lesson
  5. Repos in practice: uses, repo rates, risks and triparty structures
  6. Long-term debt: investment-grade vs high-yield issuers

Free lesson: the first lesson of every module is open to everyone.

Lesson 1 of 6 · 13 min

Short-term bank funding: credit lines, secured loans and factoring

Bank credit lines differ mainly in how firmly the bank promises to lend: the stronger the promise, the more reliable the funding and the more it costs the borrower in fees and covenants.

In short

  • Companies borrow short term to cover the cash conversion cycle, keep a liquidity cushion and take supplier discounts.
  • Uncommitted lines: cheapest and most flexible, interest only on what is drawn, but the bank can refuse to lend, so they are the least reliable.
  • Committed (regular) lines: a written promise, usually for 364 days, unsecured and prepayable, with a commitment fee on the full or unused amount.
  • Revolvers are multiyear commitments with covenants: the most reliable bank funding.
  • Secured (asset-based) loans pledge assets such as receivables or inventory. With assignment the firm still collects its receivables; with factoring it sells them at a discount and the factor collects.

Why companies need short-term funding

A company pays suppliers and workers before customers pay it. The gap, the cash conversion cycle, has to be financed. Short-term borrowing also lets a firm keep a liquidity buffer and pay suppliers early when they offer a discount.

Non-financial companies get most short-term money from banks. The three standard facilities are uncommitted lines of credit, committed lines of credit and revolving credit agreements (revolvers). Each can be unsecured or secured, depending on the borrower's strength, its credit situation and the local legal system.

Credit lines give the quickest and most flexible access to cash: the company draws when it needs money and repays when cash comes in. Uncommitted lines and revolvers are more common in the United States, while ordinary committed lines dominate elsewhere.

Three kinds of credit line

An uncommitted line lets the company borrow up to a set amount for a maximum term, paying a market reference rate (MRR) plus an issuer-specific spread only on what is outstanding. There is no other fee, which makes it the cheapest and most flexible source in good times. Banks usually grant them unsecured to customers who keep steady deposits with them, so the bank can watch the account and react quickly if balances fall.

The catch is that the bank may refuse any drawdown. Because the bank has made no promise, it holds almost no capital against the line until it is used. When conditions sour, the bank can say no just when other funding is scarce or very expensive. That is why an uncommitted line cannot be a company's primary funding source, and why it is the least reliable form of bank borrowing. For the bank, it is mainly a relationship tool funded from stable deposits.

A committed (regular) line is a formal written promise to lend. It needs more bank capital, so banks keep the term under a year (typically 364 days) to limit the capital charge, and large borrowers often get a syndicate of banks, each taking a fixed share. The line is unsecured, can be repaid early without penalty, and when drawn shows up as a short-term liability such as notes payable. The borrower pays an upfront commitment fee (for example 0.50%) on either the full line or the unused part. The risk left is renewal risk: a heavily drawn borrower whose credit is weakening may not get the line renewed.

A revolver (or operating line) is a multiyear commitment. Lenders protect themselves with covenants that require or forbid certain actions, much like a bond indenture. Rates and commitment fees work as in a regular line, and some revolvers allow a switch into a medium-term loan. Because the promise runs for years, revolvers are the most reliable bank funding.

Comparing bank credit lines
FeatureUncommitted lineCommitted (regular) lineRevolver
Bank's promiseNone: bank may refuseWritten, usually 364 daysWritten, multiyear
ReliabilityLowestMiddleHighest
Cost besides interestNoneCommitment feeCommitment fee
Lender protectionMonitors depositsCapital; may syndicateCovenants
Main risk to borrowerLine refused in a downturnNot renewed at maturityBreaching covenants
0%2%4%Cost, % of drawn4.25%4.25%Uncommitted4.25%0.6%4.85%Fee on unused4.25%1%5.25%Fee on full lineInterest (MRR + 1.25%)Commitment fee
Halden Foods' EUR 50m line with 20m drawn. Interest is the same 4.25% in every case; the commitment fee is the price of certainty, lifting the all-in cost to 4.85% or 5.25% of the amount actually used.

Think of the three lines as an umbrella you borrow, one you rent for a year, and one you own for several years. The more certain you are of having it when it rains, the more you pay for it.

Secured loans, assignment and factoring

A secured loan, also called an asset-based loan, requires the borrower to pledge collateral: fixed assets, good-quality receivables, inventory or marketable securities. The lender files a security interest (a right to the asset until the loan is repaid), and the lien appears on the borrower's credit record. Firms that are not strong enough to borrow unsecured use this route.

Receivables can raise cash in two ways. Under assignment of accounts receivable, the receivables are collateral for a loan, and the company keeps collecting them. Under factoring, the company sells the receivables to a lender (the factor), usually at a substantial discount, and the factor takes over credit granting and collection.

The size of the factor's discount depends on how creditworthy the customers are and how costly the accounts are to collect. Inventory can also back a loan in several ways.

Assignment vs factoring of receivables
AssignmentFactoring
What happens to receivablesPledged as collateralSold to the factor
Who collectsThe companyThe factor
Cost driverLoan interestDiscount: customer credit quality and collection costs

Formula

Annual cost of a committed line
Cost=(MRR+spread)×Drawn+Fee rate×Fee base\text{Cost} = (MRR + \text{spread}) \times \text{Drawn} + \text{Fee rate} \times \text{Fee base}

Fee base = the unused amount or the full line, as the agreement states. An uncommitted line has no fee term.

Worked examples

Example 1 What a committed line really costs

Halden Foods ASA has a one-year committed line of EUR 50 million at MRR + 1.25%, with the MRR at 3.00%. It keeps EUR 20 million drawn all year. The commitment fee is 0.40%. What is the total cost, and the cost as a percentage of the amount drawn, if the fee is charged (a) on the unused amount, (b) on the full line?

Example 2 Matching the facility to the borrower

Three firms want short-term bank funding. Brenna Tools is highly rated and keeps large, steady deposits with its bank. Lindqvist Retail needs funding it can count on for the next four years. Pallas Textiles has weak credit but large receivables from good customers and does not want to run its own collections. Which facility fits each?

On the exam

Expect questions ranking the lines by reliability, asking which line carries a commitment fee or covenants, why a bank prefers to offer an uncommitted line (less capital), or distinguishing assignment from factoring.

  • Calling the committed line the most reliable. Revolvers are more reliable because they run for several years.
  • Thinking uncommitted lines carry a commitment fee. They cost only interest on the amount drawn.
  • Mixing up assignment and factoring: with assignment the company keeps collecting; with factoring it sells the receivables and the factor collects.
  • Assuming syndication applies to uncommitted lines. Syndicates spread the capital burden of committed lines.

Check yourself

  1. Q1Which bank facility gives a company the most certainty that funds will be available over the next several years?

  2. Q2Tessaro SpA has a NOK 200 million committed line with a 0.30% fee on the unused amount. It keeps NOK 80 million drawn all year. The annual commitment fee is closest to:

  3. Q3A bank offers a corporate client an uncommitted line instead of the committed line it asked for. The bank's most likely reason is that the uncommitted line:

  4. Q4Compared with assigning its receivables to a lender, a company that factors them most likely:

  5. Q5Which statement about an uncommitted line of credit is least accurate?

0/5Check yourself

Answer the 5 questions: +10 XP for each one you get right first time.

Liked this lesson? Get the rest free for 7 days

Create a free account to open the other 5 lessons in this module, with videos, flashcards that come back before you forget them, the question bank and full mocks. No card needed.