Lesson 1 of 6 · All lessons in this module
  1. Sole proprietorships and partnerships
  2. Limited companies and comparing all the forms
  3. Key features of corporate issuers
  4. Corporate taxation and double taxation
  5. Publicly versus privately owned corporate issuers
  6. Going public, going private and who owns corporations

Free lesson: the first lesson of every module is open to everyone.

Lesson 1 of 6 · 13 min

Sole proprietorships and partnerships

The legal form of a business decides who carries its risks, who runs it, how its profits are taxed and how much money it can raise; sole proprietorships and partnerships are simple but leave owners personally exposed and limit growth.

In short

  • Market economies have three kinds of organisation: businesses (for profit), non-profits and governments. This module is about businesses.
  • Business forms are compared on five attributes: legal identity, owner-manager relationship, owner liability, taxation and access to financing.
  • A sole proprietorship is one owner who provides the capital, runs the business, keeps all profits and has unlimited liability.
  • In a general partnership two or more partners share control, profits and unlimited liability; if one cannot pay, the others are liable for the whole debt.
  • A limited partnership needs at least one general partner (GP) with unlimited liability who usually manages; limited partners (LPs) can lose only what they invested and usually do not manage. In a limited liability partnership (LLP) every partner has limited liability.
  • Proprietorships and partnerships are pass-through entities: no tax at the business level, owners pay personal tax on their share of profit whether or not it is distributed.

Five attributes that separate business forms

In most market economies there are three broad kinds of organisation, each with its own purpose and legal rules: businesses (companies run for profit), not-for-profit organisations (non-profits) and governments. Analysts mostly study businesses, because businesses are the main users of the capital that investors provide. Non-profits and governments still matter here, mainly as owners of businesses.

When founders set up a business they choose a legal organisational form. That choice decides how returns, risks, ownership and operating responsibilities are shared. Three broad forms exist almost everywhere: the sole proprietorship (or sole trader), the partnership and the limited company.

Each country has its own names and variants, so do not memorise national rules. Instead, compare any form on the same five questions below. They are exactly what an analyst should ask about a new investment candidate.

  • Legal identity: is the business a legal person separate from its owners?
  • Owner-manager relationship: are the owners also the people who run it?
  • Owner liability: can owners be made to pay the business's debts from personal assets?
  • Taxation: are profits taxed at the business level, the owner level, or both?
  • Access to financing: how easily can the business raise capital to grow and spread risk?

Sole proprietorship: simple, but one person carries everything

In a sole proprietorship a single owner puts up the capital, often personal savings or a personal loan, runs the business day to day and keeps every unit of profit. There is no legal separation: the business is simply an extension of the owner. In some places no registration is even needed, and the business ends when the owner stops trading or dies.

The owner takes all the return and all the risk. Profits are taxed as the owner's personal income, and the owner has unlimited liability: if the business cannot pay a supplier or a bank, the creditors can pursue the owner's house and savings.

Sole proprietorships are the most numerous businesses in most economies, because they are cheap and flexible. A family bakery or a freelance designer is the typical case. Their growth is capped by how much one person can invest, borrow and stand to lose.

Partnerships: pooling money, skills and risk

A general partnership has two or more owners, called general partners. It works like a sole proprietorship with more people: partners bring extra capital and complementary skills (sales, finance, operations, legal) and share control, profits and losses. A written partnership agreement usually sets out roles and profit shares, but a partnership can also arise verbally or simply through how people act together. Builders, small service firms and joint ventures between companies are common examples.

The catch is that all general partners have unlimited liability, shared among them. If one partner cannot pay his part of the debts, the others must cover it in full. Growth is still limited by what a few people can contribute and how much personal risk they will accept.

A limited partnership fixes part of that problem. It needs at least one general partner (GP), who has unlimited liability and usually runs the business. All other partners are limited partners (LPs): they can lose at most what they put in, their personal assets are protected, and they normally have no management role. Profits and losses are split as the agreement says, usually with a larger share for the GP in return for the extra risk. Agreements can be complex, with several tiers of partners, and they often restrict transferring a partnership interest or adding new partners.

Some jurisdictions also allow a limited liability partnership (LLP): a partnership with no general partner, where every partner has limited liability and the partners share management, usually by appointing managing partners. In some countries (the United States, for example) LLPs are restricted to professional firms such as law, accounting, engineering or architecture practices, with limits on the number of partners and on outside equity.

0100200300Maximum loss (EUR k)130270Aiko13060Lars13060PriyaGeneral partnershipLimited partnership
The first example. As general partners, all three lose their EUR 60k plus a third of the EUR 210k debt. In a limited partnership the LPs lose only their 60k, while the GP (Aiko) carries the whole shortfall.

Pass-through taxation

Sole proprietorships and partnerships are usually pass-through businesses. The business itself pays no income tax; its profit or loss is passed to the owners, who pay tax at their personal rates according to their share.

A key detail: owners are taxed on their share of profit whether or not it is paid out. If a partnership keeps profit to reinvest, the partners still owe tax on it that year. This becomes an important contrast with corporations in a later lesson.

The three partnership types at a glance
General partnershipLimited partnershipLimited liability partnership
Who managesAll partners shareGP usually manages; LPs passivePartners share; managing partners appointed
LiabilityUnlimited, shared by allGP unlimited; LPs limited to investmentLimited for every partner
TaxationPass-throughPass-throughPass-through
Typical useSmall service firms, joint venturesReal estate, investment fundsLaw, accounting, other professional firms
EUR k02040608075Share of profit−25Retained−26.25Tax at 35%23.75Cash left
The limited partner in example 2 is taxed on her full EUR 75k share, but only EUR 50k reaches her as cash. After paying EUR 26.25k of tax she keeps EUR 23.75k, because the retained EUR 25k is taxed too.

Limited liability is what lets passive money in. An outside investor will fund a business they do not run only if their downside is capped at what they invest.

Worked examples

Example 1 Who pays when a partnership fails?

Aiko, Lars and Priya each invest EUR 60,000 in a design studio and share profits equally. The studio fails: all its assets are gone and EUR 210,000 of debts remain unpaid. What is each person's maximum loss if (a) all three are general partners, (b) Priya also turns out to be unable to pay, and (c) it is a limited partnership with Aiko as GP and the others as LPs?

Example 2 Taxed on profit you never received

A limited partnership earns a profit of EUR 300,000 this year. It distributes EUR 200,000 and reinvests the rest. One LP owns a 25% interest and pays personal tax at 35%. How much income is she taxed on, and how much cash did she receive?

Example 3 Matching needs to forms

Which form best suits each case? (1) A dentist who wants to work alone with minimal paperwork; (2) four architects who want to run their firm together without any of them carrying unlimited liability; (3) a property developer who wants to run a project and bring in passive investors.

On the exam

Expect questions on who has unlimited liability (sole owner, all general partners, the GP of a limited partnership), what an LLP changes, and that partnerships are taxed as pass-through entities rather than at the entity level.

  • Saying a limited partnership gives every partner limited liability. At least one GP has unlimited liability; only an LLP removes it for everyone.
  • Thinking partnerships pay tax at the entity level. They are pass-through: partners are taxed personally.
  • Believing pass-through owners are taxed only on what is distributed. They are taxed on their share of all profit, including retained profit.
  • Assuming a partnership needs a written agreement. It can be formed verbally or through conduct.

Check yourself

  1. Q1Which organisational form provides the owners with the least personal liability for business debts?

  2. Q2An investor contributed EUR 40,000 as a limited partner. The partnership collapses with EUR 500,000 of unpaid debts. Her maximum loss is closest to:

  3. Q3In a limited partnership, the business is most likely managed by:

  4. Q4Partnerships are most accurately described as being taxed:

  5. Q5A general partner of a three-partner general partnership is least likely to be:

0/5Check yourself

Answer the 5 questions: +10 XP for each one you get right first time.

Liked this lesson? Get the rest free for 7 days

Create a free account to open the other 5 lessons in this module, with videos, flashcards that come back before you forget them, the question bank and full mocks. No card needed.